Showing posts with label Vis. Lang.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vis. Lang.. Show all posts

Monday, December 7, 2009

Vis. Lang: Final Statement







Overall on this process of getting to my complex mind map that is broken down into a book started off which having the idea of doing gate folds, bi folds, etc., but in the end it became a workbook of a better way of understanding the communication model in a step by step manner. Through out the process of doing my book, I have come to realize that I should appropriate the time I put into a mind map because it exemplifies who I am as a person, since I need things broken down so I'm able to understand more clearly. One of the things I learned about this project was the factor that there are manying different interpretations of the communication model and none are wrong because of how a viewer will look at it as a whole.

I'm thinking towards the extrapolation that will frame my whole semester for this class is the fact I used mind maps in all three of the projects, which explains how I think, this will show my process to the beginning of projects as well as being organized.

Monday, November 30, 2009

Vis. Lang: Process of where I'm going

The direction I will be going is towards the arrows being large on the chapter page and creating an image of where the eye should see. Each chapter will slowly progress with the arrows as well as the die-cuts. The page that introduces the breakdown of the chapter will have the arrows smaller but also progressing. The whole idea is to keep the viewer interested into turning the page. The additional accent color will help the viewer understand what part of the chapter they are going to learn.

Monday, November 23, 2009

Vis. Lang: More Process

Question 1 consisted of: What type of arrow would be a good approach that would not be distracting or too light compared with the line weight? Also which type of arrow is represented well for direction?

The exploration of drawing out more arrows helped to not look so default as well as helped to notice the density of the different types that could be done. The arrows that are easier to approach are the ones where it indicates an arrow but half of it is showing; I feel these arrows give another level of read and give the right amount of tonality. Hopefully the exploration has helped out to where I need to be.




Some things that I am having trouble dealing with is the copy of the introduction page that is before the major break down of what part of the communication model is. Some trouble that I am having difficulty with is the color choices that are being made, which are made up of navy, green, and orange for an accent, and then the hierarchy of the dense pages and whether they need to be crazy sizes to decide.

Now after talking to Jamie we have decided to go back to Black and White with an accent color. The form is already complex as is and the lines are communicating the the breakdown better than color. Finally getting there, but still need a lot of work for clarity.

Friday, November 20, 2009

Vis. Lang: More Process For Friday

So since Monday, I asked myself simple questions to go towards an output for the details of the book.

Question 1 consisted of: How do I make the lines not so complex and easier to read?

While approaching this question I thought of having the lines in a straight or 90 degree turn to indicate the move to the next column, but now looking at it I'm going to try diagonal lines to see if it is simpler be more clarify. For me, clarity is key in this book of breaking down a mind map of thinking. The other part of clarity was having solid line vs. dotted lines to help the direction.

The addition thing that will be done with the lines is that they will be transparency pages to create another way of looking at each step separately to understand how each step progressed. This idea will better provide another level of interacting to the book.

After doing the diagonal lines the more stair type of lines are working better.


Question 2 consisted of: Do I really need lines for connection, maybe color of the text would help connect the eye better?

When answering, the colors help to indicate the next level of information but still didn't answer the question of clarity. Color does help, but the color palette is going to be worked on to help the tonality equal and not distract the eye.
I have tried another color for the third column, so it isn't as bold and popping off the page. I'm not for sure if it is there yet.



Question 3 consisted of: Which form do I represent an interactive website through print? top or side?

As to answer this, during my exploration of looking at multiple websites was having their navigation was either on the top of the screen or along the left side. While looking at my approach as a whole having the die-cuts allow the top will help give the viewer a different aesthetic than looking at another column.


Question 4 consisted of: How do I approach arrows to indicate a direction?

The approach of arrows were either to have the arrows all be the same or have 2 different ones. Keeping them all the same would keep the unified look of the whole page. Keeping objects consistent will help with viewer understanding that through out the book that they mean the same thing and that way the viewer doesn't become confused.



Question 5 consisted of: How do I make a book more interactive to look at multiple pages at once? Also how do you make it, so the main content is consistently in the same position?

I decided that for the view to understand the book more that the page where the question is asked they could tear it out and then take notes or draw what they learn. This will give the viewer a little more understanding and they can look back at their notes when they go further into the book. Thus this book can be a learning tool.

Monday, November 16, 2009

Vis. Lang: Process/Crit. For Monday

So the intended boxes surrounding one item or two would be die-cuts that will give a window to the communication model. After my critique today, the results consisted of:

- a good approach to the size of the book, which is 8x8
- need more interactive elements, like looking at multiple pages at once for the viewer to see
- less linear
- research online websites for ideas of different type of rollovers- make notes on them and then bring them into the print world
-make icons of numbers(play out ways of icons for numbers and letters)
-framing/lines for more graphic language
-color coding system layering through density
- back and forth method on them so it is assessable, but usable
- for the answering the question make more iterations on how it could look, also lines are too close together
- may think of having the die-cuts along the top to indicate a menu bar of a navigation of a website
-think time, material, color
- layering on top like transparencies for example
- look at arrows to help explain the dense pages





Friday, November 13, 2009

Vis. Lang: Process for Friday

This idea was to have windows to open each step to go further into the information. This process would give the viewer the chance to go any direction but also understand how the model would work.


So for below, the idea was to have a tri-fold that would display the communication model and then within the inside of the object each component is explained by each page deeper in meaning until you get to my experience.
This concept is have a window to view through and then each page goes more and more in depth. This idea would keep the whole model visible for the viewer to see how it looks.

This approach is further from the experience of doing the previous one. For this one it will show continuous windows and then by certain pages another part of the model will show up and then that one will be explained.
These last two ideas of the open windows and the tri-fold are the directions I'm going to go towards for Monday to experiment for the opportunities to be shown. These directions I feel will be the best way for me to express myself of the level I think, and then the rest of the viewers would get a sense of the idea.

Thursday, November 12, 2009

Vis. Lang: Direction of Proposal Process

During my week I really got down into the crevasse of a mind map for the communication map to be able to explain each part and break it down so anyone can understand what they mean. One thing I'm going towards is a multiple page of a mind map that breaks down the necessary needs to understand what they are. From here I broke it down even more to show what can be on each page and have the main frame of the communication model in each.

Close ups:

Here are each page that would have the information on it:
On these you can tell where is more information and then going farther some don't need more information to be explained I felt.


Monday, November 9, 2009

Vis. Lang: Process of Commuication

From my first initial idea of mind maps I was thinking of ways it could be shown. This was approach I tried my best to get a good idea to be able to push enough concepts of how to approach a mind map. After talking to Jamie, I need to pull in some more layers of information thinking one component at a time. Using less of the idea of a mailer. I need to look at how things can fold and reveal the information. Overall make it a complex user experience where the use gets a lot information broken down. The next part of this process is to make BIG mind map where every little thing is broken down and then breakdown the whole big mind map down to multiple layers that could be revealed. Then from here, make mock-ups of how it would look. The other question that was brought up was do I necessarily need my postcard in the mind map, so making some ideas of symbols and icons might come into play. There will be more up later.


Friday, November 6, 2009

Vis. Lang: Concept Proposal Online Crit

Here are the main screen shots of the presentation...If need be of seeing more of the slides email me and i can get it back to you.Comments will be made on your posts (Carly, Jonathan, Kate, to let you know

Thursday, November 5, 2009

Vis Lang: Communication Model- My representation

First I figured out what the common 6 commonalities between all the models shown in the lecture, which were sender, message, channel, receiver, feedback, and noise. From there I did some quick sketches that could represent the idea conceptually to way the postcard project went for me.

From here I decided I wanted to go more in depth on the noise level among the sender and receiver since within the postcard project I didn't have a high knowledge of brewing when my partner did, which caused noise of the obvious problem for me the sender and the semantic noise for my partner. With this I choose to have my diagram become an example of the problem with having the noise becoming part of the sender and receiver instead of just of the message and channel getting the noise. I wanted to keep the sender and receiver equal in size thinking of being on the same level, but I might change the sender to a smaller size emphasizing on knowledge compared between the too which would give the obvious problem come out more. This might not work sense the feedback coming back to the receiver is receiving more knowledge which will make the senders circle to grow of knowledge.
The colors choices I made for this model was about having the main information being in same color range to represent the unit. Having the noise a different color puts an emphasis on the impact that noise could have. This representation proves what I am portraying so far.

Sunday, November 1, 2009

Vis. Lang: Postcard 3

Vis. Lang: research for postcard 3

History of Glass
Glass is an inorganic solid material that is usually clear or translucent with different colors. It is hard, brittle, and stands up to the effects of wind, rain or sun.

Glass has been used for various kinds of bottles and utensils, mirrors, windows and more. It is thought to have been first created around 3000 BC, during the bronze age. Egyptian glass beads date back to about 2500 BC.

Mosaic Glass

Modern glass originated in Alexandria during the Ptolemaic period, artisans created "mosaic glass" in which slices of colored glass were used to create decorative patterns.

Glassblowing

Glassblowing was invented during the 1st century BC by the glassmakers of Syria.

Lead Crystal Glass

During the 15th century in Venice, the first clear glass called cristallo was invented and then heavily exported. In 1675, glassmaker George Ravenscroft invented lead crystal glass by adding lead oxide to Venetian glass.

Sheet Glass

On March 25, 1902, Irving W Colburn patented the sheet glass drawing machine, making the mass production of glass for windows possible.

Glass jars and Bottles

On August 2, 1904, a patent for a "glass shaping machine" was granted to Michael Owen. The immense production of bottles, jars, and other containers owes its inception to this invention.

Collection and Processing

Two common ways to collect glass are at the curbside and at drop-off locations. Glass collected at the curbside is usually commingled, meaning that different colors of glass, and sometimes different types of glass, are collected together. This glass might then be sorted by color, or other characteristics, at a materials recovery facility. Some municipal and commercial recycling programs require participants to separate clear, brown, and green glass. Often, glass collected at drop-off locations is separated by color. Generally local recycling offices or departments of public works instruct residents on the types of glass that the recycling program collects and how residents should set out materials at the curb or drop-off centers. Curbside collection requires less work on the part of residents, although contamination levels can be greater.

Although all glass is made of silica and soda, the type and quantity vary slightly with different types of glass. These differences frequently cause manufacturing problems due to different melting points and chemical incompatibility. In addition, since neither brown nor amber glass is used to manufacture clear glass, it is important to sort glass by color. Glass separated by color, whether this takes place at the curbside or drop-off facility or at a materials recovery facility, yield glass cullet of higher economic value.

Sorting also can help reduce common contaminants, such as ceramic cups, plates and pottery, clay garden pots, crystal and opaque drinking glasses, heat-resistant ovenware, lead collars from wine and champagne bottles, stones and dirt, light bulbs, metal caps, lids and neck rings, and mirrors. Finally, sorting can keep broken glass from contaminating other recyclables, like newspapers.

In the materials recovery facility, workers remove large contaminants by hand and sort the glass by color where possible. Then, glass is typically crushed and travels by conveyor belt through a series of refinements. Magnets pull out metal, and air currents remove lightweight material such as paper. Some cullet suppliers use sophisticated equipment such as lasers to sort colors of crushed glass and further remove small contaminants. Scientists continue to develop mechanisms to improve materials sorting, and, therefore, the quality of the cullet.

Facts about recycling:
  • Glass containers are 100 percent recyclable, can be recycled endlessly and recovered glass is used as the majority ingredient in new glass containers.
  • An estimated 80 percent of recovered glass containers are made into new glass bottles.
  • According to the EPA, 34.5 percent of glass beer and soft drink bottles and 28.1 percent of all glass containers were recycled in 2007.
  • In some states, like California, glass bottle recycling nears 79 percent.
  • Americans recycle nearly 13 million glass jars and bottles every day.
  • The glass container industry has an annual revenue of $5.5. billion, with almost 50 manufacturing plants located throughout the U.S.
  • The typical glass processing facility can recycle up to 20 tons of glass per hour.
  • Glass containers produced today are 40 percent lighter than when they were 20 years ago, making them much easier to recycle.
  • Every ton of glass that is recycled results in one ton of raw materials saved to process new glass, including: 1,300 pounds of sand, 410 pounds of soda ash and 380 pounds of limestone.
  • Glass containers come in four different colors: clear, blue, brown and green; glass must be separated by color to ensure that new glass is not created from a mix of colors.
  • Most recycling programs will only accept glass containers, because other glass products such as drinking glasses, lightbulbs, mirrors and Pyrex are treated with contaminants when manufactured.
  • A 2005 study by the Beverage Packaging Environmental Council found that 18 percent of glass bottles are consumed at bars or restaurants.
  • Americans generated 13.6 million tons of glass in the municipal solid waste (MSW) stream in 2007.
  • About 24 percent of the glass was recovered for recycling.
  • Recovery increased from 750,000 tons in 1980 to more than 3.2 million tons in 2007.
  • Soft drink, beer, food, wine, and liquor containers represent the largest source of glass generated and recovered for recycling.
  • Glass in durable goods, such as furniture, appliances, and especially consumer electronics, round out the sources of postconsumer glass.

Vis. Lang: postcard 3 iterations